I am happy to announce that I have a thesis topic - "Policy effects on Alberta Oil Sands development and the enviornment." I am quite pleased at the breadth of the topic.
It seems that fighting anthroprenic global warming in Canada is as orthydox a need for the country as fighting the Nazis was in 1944. At least this is what I can gather from our big brother, CBC. Canadians are putting "the environment" above all other needs in recent surveys. This is another testament to how great our society is when our environment, which is in the best condition it has been for decades, is at the top of our concern list. Personally, my #1 concern is Canada's complete acceptance of state-sponsored media.
This reminds me of an idea I had for structuring an un-biased media (or as unbiased as possible). The largest corporations (on their own accord of course) should all put money into a fund like a University does and run its operations on the proceeds. The board of the media firm could be elected as politicians are by the people. Reporters and other news people who have shown themselves to be deeply un-biased (regardless of their political views) ideally would be the candidates that the people would vote for. The board would run the day to day activities of the company. More on this later.
Coming back to global warming here are some issues that I will look further into and develop during the next few months.
1 - UncertaintyAny honest scientist of climate change will tell you that the level of human influence on global warming is deeply uncertain. There are indeed signals which show that their may be a connection (but how important is the connection) and many of these things are currently under intense research. I am one researcher among hundreds in a well funded program whose sole purpose is to answer these questions.
Media hype has shotgunned impending global warming disaster to the forefront of everyone's mind and forced people to take often times completely irrational opinions on the matter (think Nuclear power).
Personally, I believe that the hype does have a good effect of raising capital for global warming research. We have to learn about how our earth works. This is vital for our long term success. Exploiting media fear-inducing may be the only way that we can encourage governments to spend on this research rather than other less ethical and much less useful items (like excessive social welfare programs).
While research is useful, my intitial thoughts (though this opinion may change while I research) are that it is premature for a carbon constraining policy FOR CANADA. The inherent uncertainty about how much human fossil fuel burning actually affects the climate is my first reason for this hesitation.
2 - Canada pro warming ?Lets pretend that we know that humans are warming the planet significantly. It goes without saying that Canada is very cold nation with most of our population huddled by our southern border. If Canada was to warm by say 7 degrees on average (this is the worst-case scenerio put out by my own research group) then suddenly we would have the climate of Chicago, Illinois in Edmonton, Alberta. Our land would become more productive and land value would shoot up. My initial reaction is that such a warming would have more positive effects than negative ones for Canada.
3 - Need for a team effortWe'll continute to pretend that humans are warming the planet significantly. Lets also assume that we have determined that it is a bad event for mankind. What can Canada do about it ? Instead of pretending to play a lead role (Europe has long since beat us there) by instituting economy-damaging carbon policies, will we have any effect on warming ? No.
If it takes 100 cavemen to kill a wolly mammoth then setting out to hunt it with 10 cavemen is a useless excersise in retreat. Our policy should be to convince major emitters that it is in their best interest to join the hunt. Until we can get India, USA and China on board a global emissions program, than we are just wasting our money.
4 - Policy choices HURT Canada hardCanada has an energy-dependant economy. Carbon policy would have an "unfair" impact on Canada given our energy economy. It is not in our interest to self mutilate.
---
It seems that the media and ever-trusting Canadians are taking us down a path where a carbon policy will be the norm. For a political party to win a majority, they may have to promise the self-defeating policies called out for. It is too bad that cooler heads will not prevail - I guess we humans always need something to fight for... I'll be curious to see if the conservative party is burned at the stake by the priests of global warming. I won't be surprised.
Next week I want to consider the psycology of "cognitive dissonance" and how it plays into the global warming debate. "The debate is over" right ?